Mr G W Bush may be obtained the wrong advise from his aides about the Chinese in regards to:
1. Histories
2. Culture
3. Values of Life
4. Family Values
5. Ethics & Conducts
6. Virtues
7. Believes
8. People
9. Wishes & Wants & Needs
10. Heart
These are very dangeress for a SuperPower
to take lead in the policing peace in this world.
The Chinese Language words doubts is consist of two character,
"Chai Yi" that
is guessing & doubts!!
The history of over
6,000years of wars internally, the internal war is far from over.
Although I am not born in the era of 2nd World War, however, experinces have been passed on my parents who have gone through the suffering.
even in South East Asia.. I have experiencing Riots, massacres in the 60's.. I have told the heirs that the bloodly experience of Killing & important of having peace.
The reason for the Emperor's to emphasis on Art then promoting Science & Technology in the Nation is that what the saint's in Chinese history regards Science & Technology who make their people heartless & loose their traditional culture.
The
education system & conducts is cultivating Integrity & Virtue within individual, family, society & then the Nation.As far as Han dynasty, the Emperor
Liu Cher already send his foreign Minister
Zhang Chien the Western world.
What the
Zhong Hwa Race Wants & Needs is the
Foods & Shelters for all, however, today even after New China established since 1949, the Government still have achieve only say
20% of the total populations in the upper & middle class.
The
Zhong Hwa Race for their history have exhibited that they have for long living in the Emperor Court governing system then the Russian Communism. That is the reason Mao found that his party association with the
Russian Communist system is not going to work. & Launch his so called
Culture Revolutions to push forward his
Mao's Philiosophy!! In facts, in the
Zhong Hwa Race history, Mao is not the 1st Leader to called for
"Culture Revolutions", I can single out atleast 6 major "Culture Revolutions" for the past,
say the last 3,000years of Zhong Hwa race of civilizationAfter,
Mao & Zhou passed away,
Chen Wen is behind Deng is launching the
New Market Economy for
Zhong Hwa.
Now looking at the Issue of
Taiwan & China Relationship.
One must return to the History to understand the roots & the people between
Taiwan & Fuqian , especially the Dialect speaking by the people in
ThongShan Island of Fuqian is actually the mother tongue of
Taiwan Dialect.
Back about
2,000 years ago, the people of
ThongShan even till the 1980, were mainly fishing for living.. they travel to the sea & at night they have landed in
Taiwan for rest or due to the weather conditions they stay back in the
island of Taiwan. Then they have relationships with the local Tribes, who have moved to Taiwan earlier when Taiwan was still not an island by itself.
My research into the Aboriginal of Alaska, to the Whole
North & South America, Hokaido..Japan..Taiwan..Hainan,..Guanxi...Vietnam...Phillipines
..Malaysia..Polynessia..Australia..NewZeland.. they are all at once belong to the same trides roots. Their native Language, customs, believes...food & drinks all share the common with those found in Zhong Hwa coastal sites.
When I visit the
Mayan sites in Mexico & South America, the elite official was telling me that they have the historical record that the Chinese Aboriginals are their ancesters from the
Chinese Aboriginals. Also from their birth mark during the baby time & ..many artifacts have proved that finding.
Taiwan, if the PRC would want to take it by Military aggression then, it could have happen even much earlier. As the "Chinese Government" & the people of the Nation regards
"Taiwan" is a county of PRC. For those people that in Taiwan, atleast 90% of the Baby bloomers have their relations in Fuqian mainly & those descendants of Chiang officer from all over China.
It is noted that when
Chiang make his last stop in Thongshan, he have conscripted all the males
15th years old & above to Taiwan as his soldiers.
So you see the relationship between Taiwan is still within the family.
China need Taiwan Professional & Businessmen to help to build the economy for their people, Taiwan businessmen & professional needs China as their domestic market & new home for their living.
The Wishes, Wants & needs of the
"Zhong Hwa" race is to be prosperities & survive peacefully, any war between the 2 is not going to be beneficial to the people of both who share the common roots.
Now let's look at the history of
8 nations occupations of China.. and the war between
Russia & Japan in Manchuria, then the government is using the Money & Land buy for peace.
Looking at the veitnam war as an example,
Deng could have order their soldiers to take down Honoi in hours, & then let's talk in the UN conventions. But again,
Deng have use the father figure to work out with the Vietnam by saying that Teaching them a lesson.
In the teaching
Lao Tze & Mancius, when the nation is facing the aggression from external threats then the Ruler wqould have the solid reason to call for the support of their people. The saint's also further said all weapons are considered as evil tool.
The Best
Offensive is Defence.The best thing to do &
bring Happiness & peace & stability to the people is provide Jobs, Foods, Shelter & Education.The greatest Enemy is The Enemy Within!!Between
Taiwan & China.. just leave them alone!!
As the old saying
the Parents would not kill their own heirs!!@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Bush Says Europe Should Not Lift Its China Arms EmbargoBy ELISABETH BUMILLER
BRUSSELS, Feb. 22 - A simmering dispute with Europe came to the forefront on Tuesday when President Bush said there was "deep concern" in the United States that lifting the European Union's arms embargo against China would change the balance of relations between China and Taiwan.
The issue has been one of the few disagreements to spill into the open during Mr. Bush's trip to repair relations across the Atlantic. He and European leaders have worked intently to ease hard feelings over the Iraq invasion, and they have played down the conflict that has risen in the last few months over the arms embargo. Even as he expressed his concerns on Tuesday, Mr. Bush insisted that he was willing to listen to European views on the issue.
In his most explicit public argument, the president said lifting the ban would allow the transfer of critical military technology to the Chinese that would "change the balance of relations between China and Taiwan, and that's of concern."
The administration also fears that such technology, especially advanced radar and communications systems, might be passed on to other countries.
Mr. Bush spoke at a joint news conference with the secretary general of NATO, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, after a summit meeting of alliance leaders agreed to help train security officers for Iraq.
For Europe, the end of the embargo, which was imposed in 1989 after China's crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square, would open a profitable new avenue for arms sales. But leaders also say allowing the sales, which they propose to do by June, would be an important way to forge ties with China.
President Jacques Chirac of France said Tuesday that Europe remained steadfast in its desire to end the ban. He said that "we intend to lift the last obstacles in our relations" with China. But he also said the ban should be lifted "under conditions that Europe and the United States define together."
Officials on both sides said that underneath the diplomatic words was a deep philosophical divide, and that the Americans were taking a hard line against European willingness to engage the Chinese in negotiations and promises.
The European Union is almost certain to lift the 15-year-long embargo by June, but it has tried to quell American fears by saying it will limit the transfer of advanced technology to the Chinese by developing a tough new "code of conduct" for arms exports.
Mr. Bush said he was interested in looking at that code of conduct, and went so far as to say on his second day of a four-day trip to Belgium, Germany and Slovakia that he was on a "listening tour." But he expressed skepticism about the ability of the Europeans to come up with a proposal for curbing the transfer of technology to the Chinese that would satisfy the United States.
"Whether they can or not, we'll see," he said.
A senior Bush administration official who briefed reporters on Monday night was far more unequivocal about the administration's opposition. "We remain concerned," the official said. "I should not leave you in any way with the impression that we have changed our view. We have merely heard out the Europeans. I expect that a dialogue - a friendly, serious dialogue about these issues - will continue."
Bush administration officials are most concerned that lifting the embargo would allow the Europeans to sell such advanced technology to the Chinese that they will be able to move to a "next generation" warfare capacity and develop the kind of sophisticated military systems that the United States has used in Afghanistan and Iraq. Such systems could include advanced airborne radar and communications systems, possibly similar to the American E-8C Joint Stars aircraft that help give commanders the ability to reroute troops and airstrikes quickly on the battlefield.
"The administration is not concerned at this time that the Europeans are going to start selling fighter jets, missiles and tanks to the Chinese," said Robin Niblett, the director of the European program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
In his news conference, Mr. Bush also told the Europeans that when they settled on their new code of conduct, they needed to "sell it to the United States Congress."
The president, who mentioned the problems with Congress during a small dinner he gave for Mr. Chirac on Monday night, was alluding to rising concern from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress about Europe's plans to lift the embargo.
Senator Richard G. Lugar, the Indiana Republican who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in an interview in The Financial Times on Friday that he would support restrictions on American sales of advanced military technology to Europe unless there were strong assurances from Europe that such technology would not be diverted to China when the embargo was lifted. He also said that if lifting the embargo were to result in such a diversion, he would support restrictions on the sales of American weapons technology to Europe.
Earlier this month, the House of Representatives passed a resolution by a 411-3 vote that condemned the European Union's plans.
Andy Fisher, Mr. Lugar's spokesman, said in a telephone interview on Tuesday after Mr. Bush made his remarks that Mr. Lugar was most concerned about advanced military technology passing from China to a "rogue element" that could use it against the United States.
The Department of Defense annual report on China's military last year raised another possible effect of lifting the European arms sales. It said that although Russia would most likely still be the primary supplier of advanced weapons to China, with Europe acting as "an emerging supplier," the new sales would also "enhance China's leverage in negotiating purchases," making even more advanced weapons systems and technology available.
European leaders say changes they are making to their code of conduct on arms exports, first adopted in 1998, would substantially limit sales of technology to China. Among the proposed changes would be information sharing, meaning that the European Union would inform Washington of any arms sales to China that would have been prohibited under the embargo. Such information would theoretically allow the United States to track sales and potentially keep weapons out of the wrong hands.
The Bush administration has countered that it wants more specifics from European officials about how a revised code of conduct would work in practice. "The E.U. has made certain statements, certain declarations about the hypothetical effect of lifting the arms embargo - that is, no increase qualitatively, no increase quantitatively," the senior administration official said in the briefing. "So we would like to know what that means, how this would be enforced, how this would be carried out, in view of the real-world situation."
The Bush administration also opposes lifting the embargo because in its view the Chinese are still engaged in the human rights abuses, like the arrests of dissidents, that initially caused the embargo. "The reasons for the arms embargo being imposed in the first place - that is, Tiananmen and the arrests - have not materially changed," the administration official said. "The people arrested are still in prison, the human rights situation is not appreciably better."
Later in the day, Mr. Bush met with European leaders at the headquarters of the European Union, and at a news conference afterward reiterated that the United States was not on the verge of war with Iran. But he did not rule out, as he has not in the past, military action.
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous," he said, then added, to some laughter in the room, "and having said that, all options are on the table."
Mr. Bush had a working dinner with European leaders, and then is headed on Wednesday for meetings with the German chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, in Mainz. On Thursday in Bratislava, Slovakia, he will meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.
The New York Times > International > Europe > Bush Says Europe Should Not Lift Its China Arms Embargo
