Now Let's me explain:
Why China Cannot Be & Will Not Be the Threat of Asian countries & USA.
1. China populations is 1.5Billons & US is 350millions.
2. The 2 are separated by the Pacific Ocean of some over 13,000miles.
3. China Budget of $13Billions is still less than US Budget of $19Billions to $419Billions by 2006
4. The ratio per people count is much Less than US
5. The Digital Technology & Military Technology Superior of US is Far more advance say atleast 15 years
Ahead of China.
6. Star War Technology Supreme Leadership of US
7. The Chinese Government is further reducing their Military payrolls more cut on people.
8. Looking into the history of "Zhong Hwa Race" , 6,000 years of Civil War or Family Power struggle war's
9. The integrations of Races is far to completions, Integrating over 16,0000 races into a united hormogenius race is far from ending
perhaps it would take say another 150 years or so.
10. 80% of the people still lives in poverty lines.
11. About 10% are well educated.
12. 20% of the total populations are Middle Class Who want to be having "American Dreams"
13. China Leaders know that their priority is Food, Shelter, Energy, Health, Environments, Water...
14. 80% of the people in the rural need jobs
15. Jobs needed for those retrended by the National & States Enterprise & Government's units
16. Educations for All is still far too reach
17. The Conducts & Ethics issues of those Officers in positions is a major concern for the Government & Cetral Committees
18. In the 6,000 years of Histories, Chinese people are thought by the parents not to be involve in Politics & Wars be it in the family,
societies, states & neigbouring countries.
19. The strategies times again prove that "Zhong Hwa" race is not Warriors is by the culture of "Become Rich" let's other people
do it or fight, self-caring philosophies
20. China need to have a peaceful partners to source for resources & food for
their people & stabilities.
History always prove that the "Ruller of Zhong Hwa" act like a Parents in command of the family then "Kill & Rule"
For e.g The war with India in the late 60's, The War with Russia at the Border, The war with Vietnam, which they call it teach them a lesson!!
Be it whoever in power, the philosophies of
Lao Tze,
Confusius,
Mansius, is always the main philosophies of influence
On the War & Peace Strategies.
Jiang Thai Gong
Kwei Ku Tze
Sun Tze - Sun Ping
Zhu Ker Conming
Liu Poi Wen
Mao Zhe Dong ( Mao is using Modern Mandarin to sum up those Ideologies Above)
Idealogies have been applied according to times & situations.
As Sun Tze said the best Victory is go to the War without Incurring Losses is the supreme Victories.
Also, the "Zhong Hwa Race" for generations of suffering from Wars & killing, What they needs is a peaceful life for them & for their heirs, otherwise when their ancestors left the Middle Kingdom East ward to North & South America, & West Ward to Europe & Africa some the nearest is 50-60 thousand years ago. They would have conquer the wholeworld & install themself as the Emperor of their New Foundland then not till now!!
Than telling their heirs that once they make enough money..they should return to their root.
"Chinese People Want Peace - Chinese People Need Peace!!"
"Zhong Hwa Race" Will Always be The Peaceful Race On Earth!!
The Chinese People Understand:
" When One Have The Heart of The People Then They Have The World!!"
A Heartless Warrior Would Have Short Lives!!
Rumsfeld Worried About China
NewsMax.com Wires
WASHINGTON -- President Bush's plan for the Navy calls for buying fewer ships, while China, a potential security hot spot, is increasing and repositioning its fleet. It's a prospect that concerns some lawmakers. [Story continues below...]
The plan is contained in Bush's 2006 budget proposal, which Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Thursday defended, saying the military was closely watching China's moves but that the U.S. Navy remains the pre-eminent fleet.
"The United States Navy ... is the Navy on the face of the Earth that is a true blue water navy," Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee. "On the other hand, when one looks at trend lines, it is something that we have to think about."
The Pentagon says buying fewer ships than previously planned won't affect combat ability. Previous budgets envisioned purchasing six Virginia-class attack submarines, seven DD(X) destroyers and 10 San Antonio-class amphibious landing ships through 2011.
The 2006 budget calls for three submarines, five destroyers and nine landing ships. It also proposes eliminating one of the Navy's 12 aircraft carriers. Overall, Bush is proposing to increase the Pentagon's budget by $19 billion, to $419 billion next year. The budget calls for buying fewer planes, ships and submarines in favor of spending more on counterterrorism.
Republicans and Democrats argued that cutting back now could jeopardize the Navy's long-term domination of the seas, particularly in light of China's military improvements.
Lawmakers also worry that any reductions would cost them work and jobs at the nation's shipyards.
Republican Sen. Susan Collins, whose state of Maine is home to the Bath Iron Works, one of the Navy's largest ship builders, expressed her reservations to Rumsfeld.
"I recognize that our naval fleet still remains the most technologically advanced in the world. But the decreasing number of ships being procured, particularly in the light of the Chinese buildup, really concerns me," she said.
"Are you concerned about projections that the Chinese fleet may well surpass the American fleet in terms of numbers in just a decade's time?"
"Senator," Rumsfeld replied, "it is an issue that the department thinks about and is concerned about and is attentive to."
One of Rumsfeld's top aides, Douglas Feith, echoed the secretary's views in an appearance later Thursday before the Council on Foreign Relations, a private think tank.
Feith, the undersecretary of defense for policy, singled out China as among "important powers in the world," whose strategic choices will influence U.S. national security.
"Of the new powers that are rising ... the country that can be expected to have the greatest effect on international relations is China," Feith said.
China has invested heavily in its own defense in the past few years. Prohibited from buying U.S. and European arms under an embargo, Beijing purchased at least $13 billion worth of weapons from Russia between 1993 and 2003, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. China's arsenals now are stocked with Russian-made submarines, destroyers, supersonic fighters and anti-ship missiles, as well as weapons it increasingly is making on its own.
CIA Director Porter Goss told the Senate Intelligence Committee this week that China last year increased its ballistic missile forces and rolled out several new submarines.
"Improved Chinese capabilities threaten U.S. forces in the region," Goss said.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment