At least in this country. You need to educate yourself for the Tax system. Be knowledgement about it .
I agreed that Tax-Advantaged Investments help create new businesses & New Jobs. News Jobs would Produce More PayChecks, & those additional paychecks produce more Taxes in the long term future.
However, I am in the opinion that the world of Income Tax systems need to have a total revamp. Especially in this country. Looking at the
economy transitions from the
traditional Industries to Professional Services & Knowledge based economy. Also with the aging polulations, and the Baby bloomer's are going into the retirement. I can forsees that the world is moving toward, so call the "Consumption Taxable" system. I have shared my thoughts with the President George Bush in year 2 thousand when he visit Los Angeles.
A simplified, uniform Income Tax code; lower Income tax to say 12-15%p.a. for State Tax; for The Federal Tax say lower to 8%. Then, with the consumption system, with the difference goods like Luxury & Branded goods, Spirits & Liqueurs, Cigars & Cigarettes & those non-essential items Taxing according to the Values. The food & Services Taxes should be lower too.
Then looking at the Corporation & Small Business, the incentive for lower corporation tax & also providing Tax incentive for hirring the Physical & mental healthy Baby Bloomers must be implement to encourage more Baby Bloomers to return to the employments. These in term would spur the Income Tax contributions from Baby Bloomers after they reach their retirment age. Especially from year 2008 onwards.
Medical cost & Medical Insurance shall have a reform as well. As the world is moving into Knowledge base economy. With the High cost of Medical Insurance systems, the people going to benefits most is not the government nor the citizens, It is the Provider of Insurance & those Drugs corporation. Everyone know that we are what we eat. So the problem of aging society would increase the medical cost of the individual & country as a whole.
But with the awareness & education programs, these would help to reduce the cost of Medical Care. Give tax incentives for the use of Herbs base Nutritions Supplements & for the preventions of Disease & Health preventions.
As the Old saying.
"Prevention Is Better Then Cure!!" Why should we see's the suffering in immediate future but doing nothing positive now!!
The Basics
10 big tax breaks for the rest of us advertisement
It's not just the rich who shelter huge amounts of income from the IRS. See how you stack up.
By Jeff Schnepper
Think the rich guys get all the tax breaks?
Wrong, deduction denier.
In fact, most of the big tax breaks go to middle-income earners like you and me. We don’t call them tax shelters. But that’s really what they are.
The tax pros call these shelters “tax expenditures.” These darling deductions and credits have the same impact on the federal budget as direct expenditures. That’s because they represent dollars not collected by the government. And each of these expenditures gives special or selective tax relief to only certain targeted groups of taxpayers.
Sounds like a tax shelter -- or at least a loophole -- to me.
These targeted provisions either encourage some desired activity or provide special aid to certain taxpayers. Some of them make a lot of sense. For example, the federal government seeks to encourage certain forms of investment. So, Congress has legislated accelerated rather than straight-line depreciation on new plants and equipment. This produces more tax savings up front, creating additional capital for business to expand.Banks and insurers
check your credit.
So should you.
Tax-advantaged investments help create new businesses and new jobs. These new jobs produce more paychecks, and those additional paychecks produce more taxes. In the long run, if everything works as it should, everyone wins.
Some tax expenditures have been adopted as relief provisions to ease tax hardships or to simplify tax computations. The elderly and the blind receive special financial benefits through a deduction called the “additional amount,” which is added to their standard deduction. Other tax benefits for the aged -- the retirement income credit and the potential exclusion of Social Security payments from taxable income -- also fall into this personal or hardship category.
Cost: $800 billion per year
Back in 1980, the Congressional Budget Office had 92 provisions that qualified as tax expenditures, at a cost of $206 billion. President Bush’s fiscal year 2004 budget listed 137 individual tax expenditures projected at more than $800 billion.
The financial benefits offered by these tax expenditures resemble those available on the spending side of the budget. A tax expenditure provision can provide special tax relief in any of the following ways:
Special exclusions, exemptions and deductions. These reduce taxable income and result in a smaller tax bills. Examples are tax-exempt municipal bond interest, the exclusion of employee discounts from taxable income, and dependent-care assistance programs.
Preferential rates. These reduce tax bills by applying lower rates to all or part of your income. Congress gave taxpayers a big one in 2003: the new special maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains or on qualified dividends. (It’s 5% for taxpayers in the 15% bracket or lower; 15% for everyone else.)
While the dividend and capital gains breaks are available to all, it is true that higher-end taxpayers will derive more benefit than anyone else. The Citizens for Tax Justice estimates that more than half of the benefits will go to taxpayers with incomes above $145,000.
Special credits. These are subtracted from your tax bill, rather than from the income on which your taxes are figured. For example, the child tax credit or the foreign tax credit.
Tax deferrals. Deferrals let you pay later rather than now. Such deferrals really constitute interest-free loans from the IRS. The best-known deferrals today are the contributions we make to Individual Retirement Accounts, 401(k) accounts or similar retirement funds.
The other side of big spending
Tax-expenditure spending and direct spending are two sides of the same coin. Nearly any tax expenditure can be recast as a spending program. One side reduces the revenues collected. The other side increases the actual cash outflows. The real difference is nothing more than a choice between alternative administrative mechanisms.
So much for the theory. In fact, just like spending provisions, these tax expenditures are really the result of pressure applied by special-interest groups seeking relief provisions for their own constituencies.
For example, the additional amount added to the standard deduction for the blind isn’t available for the deaf. I suspect this may have more to do with the political and lobbying power of the two groups than with any inherent difference between the hardships.
What kind of savings are you getting from your own expenditure tax shelters? A lot, according to a 2003 report by the Joint Committee on Taxation on tax expenditure estimates for fiscal years 2004-2008. Check out the tax shelter deals you may be getting. (Note: These are ranked by size.)
The biggest tax breaks
And if you’re not claiming the tax break, investigate to see if you can.
Health-care benefits. You don’t pay any tax when your employer pays the premiums for your health insurance and health care. Cost to the government over these five years: $602.7 billion.
This total doesn’t include the estimated cost for deductible health insurance and long-term care insurance premiums. That’s an additional $20 billion.
Contributions to retirement accounts. You don’t pay any current tax when you or your employer sock money away in pension and retirement plans. Cost to the government: $522.1 billion.
Lower rates on dividends and long-term capital gains. Cost to the government: $406.3 billion.
The mortgage-interest deduction. We all love the deduction for home-mortgage interest. But renters and those who own their homes free and clear get nothing. Cost to the government: $372.7 billion.
About 73% of the taxpayers who claimed this deduction on their 2002 returns earned $50,000 or more. About 47% of the total earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
State and local income taxes and personal property taxes. You get a deduction for state and local taxes and personal property taxes paid. Cost to the government: $195.2 billion.
About 94% of the 36.7 million tax returns that claimed the income tax deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. And 46% of the total earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
Charitable contributions. Very noble of you. But the rest of us kick in a part of your cost. Cost to the government: $158 billion.
About 81% of the 38.1 million tax returns that claimed this deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. About 43% of the total had earnings of between $50,000 and $100,000.
Children under age 17. The child tax credit puts $1,000 per child in your pocket. Cost to the government: $173 billion.
About 53% of the 31 million tax returns that claimed this deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. And 75% of that group earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
The earned income credit. You qualify for the earned income tax credit, which is targeted at low-income taxpayers. Cost to the government: $179.7 billion.
About 96% of the tax returns that claimed this benefit last year had earnings of $40,000 or less.
Life insurance or annuity contracts. No current tax on the inside investment income. Cost to the government: $137.5 billion.
You die. The basis for all of your assets (the value at which you start to calculate potential capital gains) is stepped up to fair market value on the date of your demise. That means that the tax on all capital gains you earned up to the date of death is lost. Cost to the government: $202.6 billion.
The total for the 10 above? $2.95 trillion over five years. And I haven’t even mentioned that the deduction you get to take for property taxes on your home will cost the feds $77.8 billion over the next five years. (A total of 34.5 million tax returns claimed the real estate property tax deduction last year.)
And the big break you now get on any profits from selling your home: Another $91.4 billion.
I’m not saying that any of these exclusions, deductions, or credits is a bad idea. I’m just shining a light on the fact that all the breaks don’t really go to the big guys.
I guess that if the expenditure puts money in my pocket, it represents good, sound tax policy.
On the other hand, if I’m a renter in a state with a high sales tax and no income tax, your deductions for interest, real estate tax and state income tax are coming out of the taxes I pay. And you’re the one with a real tax shelter. I’m the one making up the difference.
The Basics
10 big tax breaks for the rest of us
advertisement
It's not just the rich who shelter huge amounts of income from the IRS. See how you stack up.
By Jeff Schnepper
Think the rich guys get all the tax breaks?
Wrong, deduction denier.
In fact, most of the big tax breaks go to middle-income earners like you and me. We don’t call them tax shelters. But that’s really what they are.
The tax pros call these shelters “tax expenditures.” These darling deductions and credits have the same impact on the federal budget as direct expenditures. That’s because they represent dollars not collected by the government. And each of these expenditures gives special or selective tax relief to only certain targeted groups of taxpayers.
Sounds like a tax shelter -- or at least a loophole -- to me.
These targeted provisions either encourage some desired activity or provide special aid to certain taxpayers. Some of them make a lot of sense. For example, the federal government seeks to encourage certain forms of investment. So, Congress has legislated accelerated rather than straight-line depreciation on new plants and equipment. This produces more tax savings up front, creating additional capital for business to expand.Banks and insurers
check your credit.
So should you.
Tax-advantaged investments help create new businesses and new jobs. These new jobs produce more paychecks, and those additional paychecks produce more taxes. In the long run, if everything works as it should, everyone wins.
Some tax expenditures have been adopted as relief provisions to ease tax hardships or to simplify tax computations. The elderly and the blind receive special financial benefits through a deduction called the “additional amount,” which is added to their standard deduction. Other tax benefits for the aged -- the retirement income credit and the potential exclusion of Social Security payments from taxable income -- also fall into this personal or hardship category.
Cost: $800 billion per year
Back in 1980, the Congressional Budget Office had 92 provisions that qualified as tax expenditures, at a cost of $206 billion. President Bush’s fiscal year 2004 budget listed 137 individual tax expenditures projected at more than $800 billion.
The financial benefits offered by these tax expenditures resemble those available on the spending side of the budget. A tax expenditure provision can provide special tax relief in any of the following ways:
Special exclusions, exemptions and deductions. These reduce taxable income and result in a smaller tax bills. Examples are tax-exempt municipal bond interest, the exclusion of employee discounts from taxable income, and dependent-care assistance programs.
Preferential rates. These reduce tax bills by applying lower rates to all or part of your income. Congress gave taxpayers a big one in 2003: the new special maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains or on qualified dividends. (It’s 5% for taxpayers in the 15% bracket or lower; 15% for everyone else.)
While the dividend and capital gains breaks are available to all, it is true that higher-end taxpayers will derive more benefit than anyone else. The Citizens for Tax Justice estimates that more than half of the benefits will go to taxpayers with incomes above $145,000.
Special credits. These are subtracted from your tax bill, rather than from the income on which your taxes are figured. For example, the child tax credit or the foreign tax credit.
Tax deferrals. Deferrals let you pay later rather than now. Such deferrals really constitute interest-free loans from the IRS. The best-known deferrals today are the contributions we make to Individual Retirement Accounts, 401(k) accounts or similar retirement funds.
The other side of big spending
Tax-expenditure spending and direct spending are two sides of the same coin. Nearly any tax expenditure can be recast as a spending program. One side reduces the revenues collected. The other side increases the actual cash outflows. The real difference is nothing more than a choice between alternative administrative mechanisms.
So much for the theory. In fact, just like spending provisions, these tax expenditures are really the result of pressure applied by special-interest groups seeking relief provisions for their own constituencies.
For example, the additional amount added to the standard deduction for the blind isn’t available for the deaf. I suspect this may have more to do with the political and lobbying power of the two groups than with any inherent difference between the hardships.
What kind of savings are you getting from your own expenditure tax shelters? A lot, according to a 2003 report by the Joint Committee on Taxation on tax expenditure estimates for fiscal years 2004-2008. Check out the tax shelter deals you may be getting. (Note: These are ranked by size.)
The biggest tax breaks
And if you’re not claiming the tax break, investigate to see if you can.
Health-care benefits. You don’t pay any tax when your employer pays the premiums for your health insurance and health care. Cost to the government over these five years: $602.7 billion.
This total doesn’t include the estimated cost for deductible health insurance and long-term care insurance premiums. That’s an additional $20 billion.
Contributions to retirement accounts. You don’t pay any current tax when you or your employer sock money away in pension and retirement plans. Cost to the government: $522.1 billion.
Lower rates on dividends and long-term capital gains. Cost to the government: $406.3 billion.
The mortgage-interest deduction. We all love the deduction for home-mortgage interest. But renters and those who own their homes free and clear get nothing. Cost to the government: $372.7 billion.
About 73% of the taxpayers who claimed this deduction on their 2002 returns earned $50,000 or more. About 47% of the total earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
State and local income taxes and personal property taxes. You get a deduction for state and local taxes and personal property taxes paid. Cost to the government: $195.2 billion.
About 94% of the 36.7 million tax returns that claimed the income tax deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. And 46% of the total earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
Charitable contributions. Very noble of you. But the rest of us kick in a part of your cost. Cost to the government: $158 billion.
About 81% of the 38.1 million tax returns that claimed this deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. About 43% of the total had earnings of between $50,000 and $100,000.
Children under age 17. The child tax credit puts $1,000 per child in your pocket. Cost to the government: $173 billion.
About 53% of the 31 million tax returns that claimed this deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. And 75% of that group earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
The earned income credit. You qualify for the earned income tax credit, which is targeted at low-income taxpayers. Cost to the government: $179.7 billion.
About 96% of the tax returns that claimed this benefit last year had earnings of $40,000 or less.
Life insurance or annuity contracts. No current tax on the inside investment income. Cost to the government: $137.5 billion.
You die. The basis for all of your assets (the value at which you start to calculate potential capital gains) is stepped up to fair market value on the date of your demise. That means that the tax on all capital gains you earned up to the date of death is lost. Cost to the government: $202.6 billion.
The total for the 10 above? $2.95 trillion over five years. And I haven’t even mentioned that the deduction you get to take for property taxes on your home will cost the feds $77.8 billion over the next five years. (A total of 34.5 million tax returns claimed the real estate property tax deduction last year.)
And the big break you now get on any profits from selling your home: Another $91.4 billion.
I’m not saying that any of these exclusions, deductions, or credits is a bad idea. I’m just shining a light on the fact that all the breaks don’t really go to the big guys.
I guess that if the expenditure puts money in my pocket, it represents good, sound tax policy.
On the other hand, if I’m a renter in a state with a high sales tax and no income tax, your deductions for interest, real estate tax and state income tax are coming out of the taxes I pay. And you’re the one with a real tax shelter. I’m the one making up the difference.
The Basics
10 big tax breaks for the rest of us It's not just the rich who shelter huge amounts of income from the IRS. See how you stack up.
By Jeff Schnepper
Think the rich guys get all the tax breaks?
Wrong, deduction denier.In fact, most of the big tax breaks go to middle-income earners like you and me. We don’t call them tax shelters. But that’s really what they are.
The tax pros call these shelters “tax expenditures.” These darling deductions and credits have the same impact on the federal budget as direct expenditures. That’s because they represent dollars not collected by the government. And each of these expenditures gives special or selective tax relief to only certain targeted groups of taxpayers.
Sounds like a tax shelter -- or at least a loophole -- to me.
These targeted provisions either encourage some desired activity or provide special aid to certain taxpayers. Some of them make a lot of sense. For example, the federal government seeks to encourage certain forms of investment. So, Congress has legislated accelerated rather than straight-line depreciation on new plants and equipment. This produces more tax savings up front, creating additional capital for business to expand.Banks and insurers check your credit. So should you.
Tax-advantaged investments help create new businesses and new jobs. These new jobs produce more paychecks, and those additional paychecks produce more taxes. In the long run, if everything works as it should, everyone wins.
Some tax expenditures have been adopted as relief provisions to ease tax hardships or to simplify tax computations. The elderly and the blind receive special financial benefits through a deduction called the “additional amount,” which is added to their standard deduction. Other tax benefits for the aged -- the retirement income credit and the potential exclusion of Social Security payments from taxable income -- also fall into this personal or hardship category.
Cost: $800 billion per year
Back in 1980, the Congressional Budget Office had 92 provisions that qualified as tax expenditures, at a cost of $206 billion. President Bush’s fiscal year 2004 budget listed 137 individual tax expenditures projected at more than $800 billion.
The financial benefits offered by these tax expenditures resemble those available on the spending side of the budget. A tax expenditure provision can provide special tax relief in any of the following ways:
Special exclusions, exemptions and deductions. These reduce taxable income and result in a smaller tax bills. Examples are tax-exempt municipal bond interest, the exclusion of employee discounts from taxable income, and dependent-care assistance programs.
Preferential rates. These reduce tax bills by applying lower rates to all or part of your income. Congress gave taxpayers a big one in 2003: the new special maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains or on qualified dividends. (It’s 5% for taxpayers in the 15% bracket or lower; 15% for everyone else.)
While the dividend and capital gains breaks are available to all, it is true that higher-end taxpayers will derive more benefit than anyone else. The Citizens for Tax Justice estimates that more than half of the benefits will go to taxpayers with incomes above $145,000.
Special credits. These are subtracted from your tax bill, rather than from the income on which your taxes are figured. For example, the child tax credit or the foreign tax credit.
Tax deferrals. Deferrals let you pay later rather than now. Such deferrals really constitute interest-free loans from the IRS. The best-known deferrals today are the contributions we make to Individual Retirement Accounts, 401(k) accounts or similar retirement funds.
The other side of big spending
Tax-expenditure spending and direct spending are two sides of the same coin. Nearly any tax expenditure can be recast as a spending program. One side reduces the revenues collected. The other side increases the actual cash outflows. The real difference is nothing more than a choice between alternative administrative mechanisms.
So much for the theory. In fact, just like spending provisions, these tax expenditures are really the result of pressure applied by special-interest groups seeking relief provisions for their own constituencies.
For example, the additional amount added to the standard deduction for the blind isn’t available for the deaf. I suspect this may have more to do with the political and lobbying power of the two groups than with any inherent difference between the hardships.
What kind of savings are you getting from your own expenditure tax shelters? A lot, according to a 2003 report by the Joint Committee on Taxation on tax expenditure estimates for fiscal years 2004-2008. Check out the tax shelter deals you may be getting. (Note: These are ranked by size.)
The biggest tax breaks
And if you’re not claiming the tax break, investigate to see if you can. Health-care benefits. You don’t pay any tax when your employer pays the premiums for your health insurance and health care. Cost to the government over these five years: $602.7 billion.
This total doesn’t include the estimated cost for deductible health insurance and long-term care insurance premiums. That’s an additional $20 billion.
Contributions to retirement accounts. You don’t pay any current tax when you or your employer sock money away in pension and retirement plans. Cost to the government: $522.1 billion.
Lower rates on dividends and long-term capital gains.
Cost to the government: $406.3 billion.
The mortgage-interest deduction. We all love the deduction for home-mortgage interest. But renters and those who own their homes free and clear get nothing. Cost to the government: $372.7 billion.
About 73% of the taxpayers who claimed this deduction on their 2002 returns earned $50,000 or more. About 47% of the total earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
State and local income taxes and personal property taxes. You get a deduction for state and local taxes and personal property taxes paid. Cost to the government: $195.2 billion.
About 94% of the 36.7 million tax returns that claimed the income tax deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. And 46% of the total earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
Charitable contributions.
Very noble of you. But the rest of us kick in a part of your cost. Cost to the government: $158 billion.
About 81% of the 38.1 million tax returns that claimed this deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. About 43% of the total had earnings of between $50,000 and $100,000.
Children under age 17. The child tax credit puts $1,000 per child in your pocket. Cost to the government: $173 billion.
About 53% of the 31 million tax returns that claimed this deduction reported earnings of $50,000 or more. And 75% of that group earned between $50,000 and $100,000.
The earned income credit. You qualify for the earned income tax credit, which is targeted at low-income taxpayers. Cost to the government: $179.7 billion.
About 96% of the tax returns that claimed this benefit last year had earnings of $40,000 or less.
Life insurance or annuity contracts. No current tax on the inside investment income. Cost to the government: $137.5 billion.
You die. The basis for all of your assets (the value at which you start to calculate potential capital gains) is stepped up to fair market value on the date of your demise. That means that the tax on all capital gains you earned up to the date of death is lost. Cost to the government: $202.6 billion.
The total for the 10 above? $2.95 trillion over five years. And I haven’t even mentioned that the deduction you get to take for property taxes on your home will cost the feds $77.8 billion over the next five years. (A total of 34.5 million tax returns claimed the real estate property tax deduction last year.)
And the big break you now get on any profits from selling your home: Another $91.4 billion.
I’m not saying that any of these exclusions, deductions, or credits is a bad idea. I’m just shining a light on the fact that all the breaks don’t really go to the big guys.
I guess that if the expenditure puts money in my pocket, it represents good, sound tax policy.
On the other hand, if I’m a renter in a state with a high sales tax and no income tax, your deductions for interest, real estate tax and state income tax are coming out of the taxes I pay. And you’re the one with a real tax shelter. I’m the one making up the difference.
MSN Money - 10 big tax breaks for the rest of us
